Cxbladder Monitor testing to reduce cystoscopy frequency in patients with bladder cancer.

PURPOSE: Bladder cancer surveillance is associated with high costs and patient burden. CxMonitor (CxM), a home urine test, allows patients to skip their scheduled surveillance cystoscopy if CxM-negative indicating a low probability of cancer presence. We present outcomes from a prospective multi-institutional study of CxM to reduce surveillance frequency during the coronavirus pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligible patients due for cystoscopy from March-June 2020 were offered CxM and skipped their scheduled cystoscopy if CxM-negative. CxM-positive patients came for immediate cystoscopy. The primary outcome was safety of CxM-based management, assessed by frequency of skipped cystoscopies and detection of cancer at immediate or next cystoscopy. Patients were surveyed on satisfaction and costs. RESULTS: During the study period, 92 patients received CxM and did not differ in demographics nor history of smoking/radiation between sites. 9 of 24 (37.5%) CxM-positive patients had 1 T0, 2 Ta, 2 Tis, 2 T2, and 1 Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) on immediate cystoscopy and subsequent evaluation. 66 CxM-negative patients skipped cystoscopy, and none had findings on follow-up cystoscopy requiring biopsy. Six of these patients did not attend follow-up, 4 elected to undergo additional CxM instead of cystoscopy, 2 stopped surveillance, and 2 died of unrelated causes. CxM-negative and positive patients did not differ in demographics, cancer history, initial tumor grade/stage, AUA risk group, or number of prior recurrences. Median satisfaction (5/5, IQR 4-5) and costs (26/33, 78.8% no out-of-pocket costs) were favorable. CONCLUSIONS: CxM safely reduces frequency of surveillance cystoscopy in real-world settings and appears acceptable to patients as an at-home test.

Diffused bladder wall calcification in a survivor with severe coronavirus disease 2019: A case report.

RATIONALE: Bladder calcification is a rare presentation that was first interpreted to be related to a urea-splitting bacterial infection. Aside from infection, other hypotheses such as schistosomiasis, tuberculosis, cancer, and cytokine-induced inflammatory processes have also been reported. Severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is known for its provoking cytokine storm and uninhibited systematic inflammation, and calcification over the coronary artery or lung has been reported as a long-term complication. PATIENT CONCERNS: We presented a 68 years old man who had persistent lower urinary tract symptoms after recovery from severe COVID-19. No urea-splitting bacteria were identified from urine culture. DIAGNOSIS: Cystoscopy examination revealed diffuse bladder mucosal and submucosa calcification. INTERVENTIONS: Transurethral removal of the mucosal calcification with lithotripsy. OUTCOMES: The patient's lower urinary tract symptoms improved, and stone analysis showed 98% calcium phosphate and 2% calcium oxalate. No newly formed calcifications were found at serial follow-up. CONCLUSION: Diffuse bladder calcification may be a urinary tract sequela of COVID-19 infection. Patients with de novo lower urinary tract symptoms after severe COVID-19 should be further investigated.

Comparative Analysis of the Efficacy of Transurethral Bipolar Plasma Needle Electrode and Ring Electrode in the Treatment of Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.

Bladder cancer is the most prevalent tumor of the urinary tract, ranking seventh in males and seventeenth in women. The gold standard for the definitive diagnosis and initial treatment of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer is transurethral resection (TUR) of the bladder tumor. The ability to accurately detect disease, typically in the presence of hematuria as well as to detect early recurrent tumors in patients with a history of NMIBC, is critical to the successful treatment of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Unfortunately, the current biomarker landscape for NMIBC is still evolving. Cystoscopy remains the gold standard, but it can still miss 10% of tumors. As a result, physicians frequently employ additional diagnostic tools to aid in the diagnosis of bladder cancer. The efficacy of transurethral bipolar plasma needle electrodes and ring electrodes in the treatment of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer was compared and analyzed in this study. During our study, 100 patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer admitted to our hospital between June 2019 and June 2020 were randomly assigned to a control group and an observation group, with 50 cases in each group. The observation group was given a bipolar plasma needle electrode, while the control group was given a bipolar plasma ring. Patients continued to receive bladder irrigation chemotherapy as well as traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) treatment as part of our treatment plan, while the control group received only bladder irrigation chemotherapy. Clinical factors such as operational blood loss, catheter indention time, length of hospital stay, and others were compared between the two groups. When the risk grades in the two groups were compared, the observation group had fewer medium- and high-risk grades than the control group, but the control group had more low-risk grades, with statistical significance (P < 0.05).

Urothelial carcinoma in COVID-19: lessons from a pandemic and their impact on clinical practice.

The COVID-19 pandemic has modified the management of urothelial carcinoma (UC). Eighteen months after the onset of the pandemic, a scoping narrative review was able to state that radical cystectomy for UC should not be delayed beyond 10 weeks when neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) was administered and 12 weeks when it was not. NAC should be considered when imminent chemotherapy cannot be performed. Early cystectomy should not be delayed when indicated for patients with high-risk non-MIBC. Patients with non-MIBC should still receive their induction doses of intravesical instillations. Diagnostic cystoscopy should not be deferred in symptomatic patients. Surgical management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) allows for a wider deferral interval.

An unusual presentation of synchronous bladder metastases from an oesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Adenocarcinoma of the bladder is a rare form of malignancy accounting for fewer than 2% of bladder tumours. It is most commonly a result of direct invasion from prostatic, rectal or gynaecological primaries and less commonly presents from distant haematological or lymphatic metastasis. We report a rare case of oesophageal carcinoma metastasising to the bladder. It involves a 71-year-old man with progressive dysphagia and diagnostic computerised tomography findings of thickening in the oesophagus, bladder and common bile duct. Subsequent endoscopic biopsies of the oesophageal and bladder abnormalities showed immunohistochemical features consistent with upper gastrointestinal malignancy. This report aims to add to current clinical evidence of this route of metastasis and also highlight some of the key markers used by pathologists in interpretation of specimens. It also emphasises the essential role of a multidisciplinary approach for the diagnosis of such rare conditions.

Impact of delay in cystoscopic surveillance on recurrence and progression rates in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of delay in cystoscopic surveillance on recurrence and progression rates in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 407 patients from four high-volume centres with NMIBC that applied for follow-up cystoscopy were included in our study prospectively. Patients' demographics and previous tumour characteristics, the presence of tumour in follow-up cystoscopy, the pathology results of the latest transurethral resection of bladder tumour (if tumour was detected) and the delay in cystoscopy time were recorded. Our primary outcomes were tumour recurrences detected by follow-up cystoscopy and progression. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed using the possible factors identified with univariate analyses (P values ≤ .2). RESULTS: A total of 105 patients (25.8%) had tumour recurrence in follow-up cystoscopy, and 20 (5.1%) of these patients had disease progression according to grade or stage. In multivariate analysis, the number of recurrences (OR: 1.307, P < .001) and the cystoscopy delay time (62-147 days, OR: 2.424, P = .002; >147 days, OR: 4.883, P < .001) were significant risk factors for tumour recurrence on follow-up cystoscopy; the number of recurrences (OR: 1.255, P = .024) and cystoscopy delay time (>90 days, OR: 6.704, P = .002) were significant risk factors for tumour progression. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that a 2-5 months of delay in follow-up cystoscopy increases the risk of recurrence by 2.4-fold, and delay in cystoscopy for more than 3 months increases the probability of progression by 6.7-fold. We suggest that cystoscopic surveillance should be done during the COVID-19 pandemic according to the schedule set by relevant guidelines.

Efficacy of the novel, innovative, single-use grasper integrated flexible cystoscope for ureteral stent removal: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to define the published impact, efficacy, cost-effectiveness and precise role of the Isiris-α device: the world's first sterile, single-use grasper integrated flexible cystoscope (SUGIFC) for ureteral stent removal. METHODS: After PROSPERO registration (CRD42021228755), the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were utilized. The search terms "Grasper Integrated Flexible Cystoscope," and "Isiris," within the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and EMBASE were searched. RESULTS: In this review, a cumulative total experience (10 publications) included 970 "SUGIFC" procedures (755 patients). However, only 366/970 procedures were actually used for "ureteral stent removal," with the remainder being surveillance cystoscopy only (603/970) or foreign body retrieval (1/970). Procedure-related and device failures in planned "removal of ureteral stents," was reported in 8/366 (346 patients) and 1/366 (346 patients), respectively. The cost-benefit utilizing the SUGIFC device is advantageous compared to "in-theatre" stent removals and favours less busy centres where maintenance, repair and replacement costs are more relevant. Other listed benefits include shorter stent indwelling times, shorter procedure duration, lower rates of bacteriuria and urinary tract infections, fewer emergency department visits and lower readmission rates. Technical limitations include the absence of an independent working channel, a narrower visual field and the lack of image universality since the monitor is device-specific. CONCLUSION: The SUGIFC device needs to be outweighed against local costs and individual health systems. Its application in ambulatory ureteral stent removal may become significant due to the accessibility and convenience that it offers the attending urologist.

Considerations for Bedside Urologic Procedures in Patients With Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2.

OBJECTIVE: To provide guidance when performing bedside urologic procedures on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) positive patients and offer considerations to maximize the safety of the patients and providers, conserve supplies, and provide optimal management of urologic issues. METHODS: Urologic trainees and attending physicians at our institution, who are familiar with existing safety recommendations and guidelines regarding the care of infected patients, were queried regarding their experiences to determine an expert consensus on best practices for bedside procedures for SARS-CoV-2 positive patients. RESULTS: Our team developed the following general recommendations for urologic interventions on SARS-CoV-2 positive patients: maximize use of telehealth (even for inpatient consults), minimize in-room time, use personal protective equipment appropriately, enlist a colleague to assist, and acquire all supplies that may be needed and maintain them outside the room. Detailed recommendations were also developed for difficult urethral catheterization, bedside cystoscopy, incision and drainage of abscesses, and gross hematuria/clot irrigations. CONCLUSION: As patients hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 infection are predominantly men over 50 years old, there are significant urologic challenges common in this population that have emerged with this pandemic. While there is tremendous variation in how different regions have been affected, the demographics of SARS-CoV-2 mean that urologists will continue to have a unique role in helping to manage these patients. Here, we summarize recommendations for bedside urologic interventions specific to SARS-CoV-2 positive patients based on experiences from a large metropolitan hospital system. Regulations and requirements may differ on an institutional basis, so these guidelines are intended to augment specific local protocols.